Featured

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 4 — Background and Themes

(0 User reviews) 1156

In Category - Medicine

Authors: Pepper, William, 1843-1898 [Editor], Starr, Louis, 1849-1925 [Editor] Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2020 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Medicine -- Practice Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 452,696

Reading time 1969 min

Text sections 86

The source record for A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 4 — Background and Themes measures this digital text at 452,696 words, 32 hr 49 min estimated reading time, and 86 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Medicine -- Practice,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #62587

This editorial note examines how the opening, middle, and later excerpts of Volume 4 guide a first reading of this 1886 medical reference, focusing on its structure, citation practices, and pathological descriptions.

Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg62587

Read the Text

was also present in many cases.

Cough, with mucus or muco-purulent sputa, sometimes with hæmoptysis, was a very common symptom.

Many of the patients lost flesh and strength and became anæmic.

COURSE OF THE DISEASE.--There is a great deal of similarity in the histories of patients who suffer from the combination of cardiac and renal disease. There is first the history of the heart disease. A patient goes on for a number of years, sometimes apparently perfectly well and unconscious that his heart is diseased, sometimes more or less troubled with cough, cardiac dyspnoea, and palpitation. But after a longer or shorter time there is a marked change for the worse. Either gradually or rapidly the cough becomes worse, the dyspnoea greater, the functions of the stomach are disturbed, the patient loses flesh and strength, dropsy is developed, and finally cerebral symptoms. Some die suddenly, some with exhaustion, some with dropsy, some with dyspnoea, some comatose. It is always possible for the patient to recover from the first attack of this kind, sometimes even from a second, but eventually there comes an attack which proves fatal.

The most striking cases are those in which cardiac disease exists for many years without giving any symptoms, and then the symptoms are developed rapidly. Such persons, although they have organic disease of the heart, may seem to enjoy perfect health. They may even be able to take long walks, climb mountains, or perform laborious work. On some day they suddenly become sick. Sometimes the exciting cause of the attack is a pleurisy or a pericarditis, sometimes there is no apparent cause. The first symptom is usually dyspnoea, and this is not an ordinary cardiac dyspnoea. It is a very distressing and constant dyspnoea, which does not allow the patients to lie down. They pass days and nights sitting in a chair, fatigued, ready to sleep, but kept awake by the constant dyspnoea. Some of these patients will die at the end of a few days; others live longer and develop dropsy, anæmia, and cerebral symptoms.

When the chronic congestion of the kidneys is secondary to emphysema of the lungs, the course of affairs is much the same. The patient goes on for a number of years with the ordinary symptoms of emphysema, and then gradually or suddenly becomes worse. Dyspnoea, dropsy, {72} anæmia, cerebral symptoms make their appearance, and the case terminates in the same way as the cardiac cases.

DURATION.--How long congestion of the kidneys may exist without producing symptoms it is hard to say. Certainly it may exist for a number of days without any apparent disturbance of the functions of the kidney. Whether it may exist for a time, give symptoms, and then disappear, is uncertain; the rule seems to be that the lesion, when once well established, persists up to the death of the patient.

TREATMENT.--It must be acknowledged that we can hardly hope for a cure of the lesion of the kidneys, and that even alleviation of the symptoms is not always possible. The mechanical cause of the obstruction to the venous circulation cannot be removed, and it is not only the functions of the kidneys that are disturbed, but those of the lungs, liver, spleen, stomach, and small intestine. Still, we can do something. The iodide of potassium, convallaria, caffeine, and digitalis may be of service in equalizing and strengthening the heart's action, and at the same time act as diuretics. Inhalations of the nitrite of amyl dilate the arteries and capillaries, and so unload the veins. Opium is the great remedy for the dyspnoea, although it must be given with caution. Inhalations of ether may render the patient's last days more comfortable.

BRIGHT'S DISEASE OF THE KIDNEYS.

After considering separately the condition of chronic congestion of the kidney, we find that there are a group of kidney diseases characterized by certain rational symptoms, changes in the urine, and alterations in the structure of the kidneys which are popularly known by the name of Bright's disease.

Various attempts have been made to classify these cases.

1. All the kidney lesions have been supposed to correspond to the stages of an inflammatory process--a stage of congestion, a second stage of exudation, and a third stage of contraction.

2. The disease has been divided, according to its clinical symptoms, simply into acute and chronic Bright's disease.

3. The gross appearances have been taken as a standard, and the cases are classed as examples of large white kidney, atrophied kidney, waxy kidney, etc.

4. The kidneys have been compared to mucous membranes, and authors speak of catarrhal and croupous nephritis.

5. The disease has been classified, according to the particular part of the kidney affected, into parenchymatous, tubular, glomerular, interstitial, and diffuse nephritis.

Continue Reading →

Volume 4 of A System of Practical Medicine opens with a title page that immediately signals its scope: diseases of the genito-urinary and cutaneous systems, plus medical ophthalmology and otology. The table of contents reveals a collaborative structure, with each section authored by a different specialist—a deliberate editorial choice that shapes how readers encounter the material. The first excerpt from the section on chronic metritis shows a dense, citation-heavy style: the author invokes Scanzoni, Klob, Braun, and others, building an argument through named authorities. This pattern recurs throughout the volume, making the reader aware that each disease is presented as a synthesis of contemporary European and American opinion.

A Collaborative Architecture

The table of contents lists over twenty sections, each credited to a named physician—Robert T. Edes on kidney diseases, Francis Delafield on parenchyma of the kidneys, Louis A. Duhring and Henry W. Stelwagon on skin diseases, and so on. This division of labor is not merely organizational; it reflects the editors’ aim to present authoritative, specialized knowledge. For a first-time reader, the table of contents functions as a roadmap: one can jump directly to a section of interest, trusting that each contributor writes from clinical experience. The presence of a section on myalgia and progressive muscular atrophy, placed here “for convenience,” hints at the practical compromises behind the volume’s arrangement.

Citation as Argument

The excerpt on chronic metritis demonstrates how heavily the authors rely on cited authorities. Scanzoni’s 1863 work is the backbone, with his two-stage model—infiltration and induration—presented in detail. The text then lists opposing views: Klob considers the condition a new formation, while Klebs questions its inflammatory origin. This is not a simple summary; the author adjudicates between sources, noting that Fritsch “materially strengthened” Scanzoni’s position. A reader unfamiliar with the debates will see that medical knowledge here is contested and evolving. The frequent parenthetical citations (e.g., “14 Op. cit., p. 299”) create a scholarly apparatus that rewards careful attention.

Pathological Description and Clinical Language

The description of uterine induration is vivid: “the knife creaks as it divides the structures.” Such sensory details are rare but effective, grounding abstract pathology in tangible experience. The text distinguishes between stages by physical signs—enlargement, color, consistency—and links them to underlying processes like venous hyperæmia and connective tissue overgrowth. This language bridges anatomy and bedside diagnosis. For a reader new to the material, the progression from “soft and doughy” to “tough and hard” offers a clear mental image. The authors also note when a stage “cannot be invariably viewed as of an inflammatory character,” showing a cautious, evidence-based approach.

Navigating the Volume’s Scope

The volume covers an unusually wide range: from kidney diseases to skin disorders to eye and ear conditions. The excerpts suggest that each section follows a similar pattern—etiology, pathology, symptoms, treatment—but the depth varies. The chronic metritis excerpt, for instance, dives into microscopic anatomy and European literature, while other sections may be more concise. A first-time reader should use the table of contents to locate relevant sections, then skim for the structural cues (e.g., “Pathological Anatomy,” “Etiology”) that organize each chapter. The index at the end will help cross-reference terms like “hyperæmia” or “induration” across different authors.

This volume rewards a selective, rather than linear, reading. The collaborative authorship means that each section can stand alone, but the consistent citation style and pathological framework create coherence. Pay attention to the dates of cited works—they reveal which ideas were current in 1886. The excerpts show that the editors prioritized comprehensiveness and debate over a single doctrine, making this a valuable record of late-nineteenth-century American medical thought.

That rainy afternoon, I kept losing my place in the 1886 medical volume, its dense pathological descriptions blurring into the gray window light. Yet its careful structure made me wonder about the doctor who compiled such orderly observations—and the patients who never saw those dry citations. That thought led me, almost by accident, to Two years and four months in a lunatic asylum — A Closer Reading, where the same clinical distance feels personal, even tender.