Theory of circulation by respiration — Inside the Classic
Edition facts
Theory of circulation by respiration — Inside the Classic can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 12,690 words, 56 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 25.8 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Respiration,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Produced by Frank van Drogen, Laura Wisewell and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This book was produced from scanned images of public domain material from the Google Print project.)
CIRCULATION BY RESPIRATION.
SYNOPSIS OF ITS PRINCIPLES AND HISTORY.
WRITTEN, BY REQUEST, FOR THE "U. S. JOURNAL OF HOMŒOPATHY," BY EMMA WILLARD.
NEW-YORK: FRANCIS HART & CO. PRINTERS AND STATIONERS, 63 CORTLANDT STREET. 1861.
CIRCULATION BY RESPIRATION.
First step in the discovery--Animal Heat the product of Respiration. Second step--Heat evolved in the lungs by Respiration there produces Expansion. Third step--Expansion; implied motion, which from the organism must conduct the blood to the left ventricle of the Heart. Theory imperfect, until the formation of sufficient vapor or steam in the lungs is perceived and acknowledged.
TO DR. MARCY.--In complying with your request to write for your journal an article embodying my theory of the motive powers which produce the circulation of the blood, together with some account of its rise and progress, I obey what I regard as a call of duty; and thus requested, do it with pleasure.
But my theory, with its history, cannot thus be written without egotism. Logicians say, that the way to convince others is to retrace, in order, the steps by which you yourself became convinced, which is to be egotistic. But in this case, there is a further reason: the scientific discoverer must speak of the apparatus by which he experiments, and mine was often my own physical frame.
Twenty years ago, while yet my mind, laboring with this great subject, was condemned
"to drudge Without a second and without a judge,"
you, sir, comprehended the hypothesis which has now become a theory, and you waited not for others to speak, but you fully acknowledged its truth; and although, in Hartford, as now in New-York, you were thronged with practice, (then allopathic), you yet found time to furnish me with added experiments, made in your office, confirmatory of its truth, which by your permission were afterwards added in your name to my published work.
The first step in the theory occurred to my mind in the winter of 1822, and while I was engaged in founding the Troy Female Seminary. Being in attendance on a course of lectures on chemistry, and at the same time teaching to a class Mrs. Marcett's excellent work on that subject, one cold morning, as I was walking briskly up a hill, I said to myself, Why do I grow warm? Whence comes this accession of caloric? It cannot be transmitted to me from any object without, because every thing which comes in contact with me is cold. Snow is under my feet, and frosty air surrounds me; and, as to clothing, even the softest furs _impart_ no warmth--they but keep from escaping that which comes from within. What other method besides transmission is there of gaining heat? There is the elimination of caloric, when, in substances chemically combining, weight is gained and bulk is lost. Is there any such combination going on in me? Yes; this atmospheric air, when I inspire it, has oxygen combined with nitrogen; but when I expire, the oxygen has disappeared, and heavier substances--carbonic acid gas and watery vapor--are returned in its place. Thus, it must be, animal heat is evolved. It is the product of respiration; and it is because I breathe faster and deeper, that more carbon is oxidized or burned, and more heat is set free in my lungs; and therefore I grow warm as I walk up this hill, though all around me is cold.
The mind, excited by new and great thoughts, works with unwonted energy; and mine at once collected so many proofs, that I became perfectly convinced of the truth of the hypothesis. In searching books, I found that Lavoisier had taught the same; but he dying, his doctrine was discarded by English chemists, Dr. Black leading the way, and therefore it did not then appear in English systems of chemistry. But from that time, I cherished it with a mother's devotion, watched changes in my own physical frame relating to it, taught it to my pupils, and held warm disputes with the medical faculty, who opposed and contemned it.
Emma Willard opens her 1861 treatise with a direct address to Dr. Marcy, framing the work as a duty and a pleasure. She immediately acknowledges the necessary egotism of retracing her own steps of discovery, noting that her experimental apparatus was often her own body. The narrative begins with a vivid scene from 1822: walking briskly up a hill on a cold morning, she asks herself why she grows warm, rejecting external sources of heat and positing internal chemical combination. This personal, almost conversational tone sets the stage for a theory built on introspection and observation.
A Theory Born from a Winter Walk
The first section traces the theory's origin to a specific moment in 1822, while Willard was founding the Troy Female Seminary. Attending chemistry lectures and teaching from Mrs. Marcet's work, she questioned the source of animal heat during a brisk uphill walk. Her reasoning is methodical: snow and frosty air cannot transmit warmth; clothing only retains internal heat. She then recalls the principle of chemical combination—caloric eliminated when substances combine with loss of bulk and gain of weight. This leads her to hypothesize that respiration is such a combination, producing heat and, by expansion, motion. The passage is notable for its blend of everyday experience and scientific reasoning, with Willard presenting herself as both observer and subject.
The Cholera Cure as Proof
Willard recounts a dramatic case from 1850 to demonstrate her theory's practical application. Jane Phayre, a servant, is found with a "clay-cold death-look" and "frightful blackness around her eyes," barely breathing. Willard drags her outside, instructs her to breathe deeply, and watches as color returns and the woman exclaims, "Oh! I feel well!" The description is visceral: livid face, feeble pulse, inarticulate speech. Willard interprets the recovery as proof that removing carbonic acid allowed oxygen to ignite carbon in venous blood, restoring motive power. She frames the event as a unique experiment, asking rhetorically if anyone else would have attempted such a rescue. The section underscores her confidence in the theory's explanatory power.
Personal Experiment and Public Advocacy
Willard describes her own near-fatal experience in a New York hotel room in 1850, after a poorly ventilated convention. Exhausted, she sleeps in a room with fresh paint fumes and wakes unable to move, with only feeble gasps. She credits her knowledge of the theory as her antidote, implying she applied deep breathing to revive herself. The narrative then shifts to her public efforts: letters from cured patients, testimony from physicians, and a report read to the New York State Association of Teachers in 1851. These elements show Willard actively disseminating her theory through medical and educational channels, blending personal testimony with institutional validation.
Willard's treatise is as much a personal memoir as a scientific argument. Readers should attend to how she weaves together autobiographical vignettes, physiological reasoning, and case evidence. The text rewards those who follow her logical steps—from the initial spark of insight to the dramatic bedside experiments—while remaining aware that the excerpts cover only part of her full argument. Her voice, direct and unapologetic, challenges conventional medical authority by placing her own experience at the center of discovery.
Reading Willard’s insistence that respiration moves the blood, I recall my own quiet shock when I first traced Harvey’s logic–how a single bold idea can reshape what we feel inside our own chests. That same strange intimacy returned here, a private hum between the pages. William Harvey and the Discovery of the Circulation of the Blood — Story, Setting & Ideas once gave me that patient thrill, as if the body had whispered its secret just to me.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How did this book work for you?
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.